Investigation Report: PepePawn (PEPA)

Executive Summary

Date: August 21, 2025

Overall Score: 4.1 / 10

Risk Level: HIGH

Recommendation: AVOID

PepePawn presents a novel concept combining meme culture with DeFi pawning services, but exhibits significant red flags including multiple conflicting token details across platforms, questionable presale mechanics, and limited team transparency. The project shows confusion regarding its own tokenomics and platform details.

1. Project Overview (5 / 10)

Problem Statement

Proposed Solution

Assessment: The concept of a crypto pawn shop is innovative and addresses a legitimate market need. However, execution details are poorly communicated with conflicting information across different platforms regarding tokenomics and platform specifics.

2. Technology Analysis (3 / 10)

AspectFindings
ArchitectureClaims multi-blockchain support (Ethereum, Solana mentioned)
InnovationNovel pawn shop concept but no technical specifications available
Development StatusStill in presale phase with no working product demonstrated
SecuritySolidProof audit completed but limited scope documentation

3. Team & Governance (2 / 10)

Legal entity: Claims British Virgin Islands incorporation but no verification provided

Governance structure: Future DAO implementation mentioned but no current governance mechanisms

4. Tokenomics Analysis (2 / 10)

MetricDetailsRisk Level
Total Supply100B (conflicts with other sources claiming different amounts)High - Inconsistent information
Presale50% (50B PEPA)High - Excessive presale allocation
Treasury25% (25B PEPA)High - Large team-controlled allocation
Team10% (10B PEPA)Medium - Reasonable team allocation
Marketing5% (5B PEPA)Low - Conservative marketing allocation
Listing10% (10B PEPA)Medium - Standard listing allocation

5. Market Analysis (4 / 10)

6. Risk Assessment (3 / 10)

Risk CategoryKey ConcernsProbabilityImpact
TechnicalNo working product, conflicting platform detailsHighHigh
MarketCompetitive DeFi lending space, meme token volatilityMediumHigh
RegulatoryPotential securities issues, lending regulationsMediumHigh
TeamUnverified team credentials, limited transparencyHighTotal Loss

Overall Risk: HIGH

7. Legitimacy Verification (4 / 10)

Positive Indicators

Red Flag Indicators

8. Financial Projections

9. Investment Recommendation

Recommendation: AVOID

Disqualifying Factors:

Alternatives: Established DeFi lending protocols like Aave, Compound, or legitimate crypto collateral platforms with proven track records

10. References & Important Links

Due Diligence Resources

Analysis Sources